US Citizen Corps Harassing Other Citizens/Immigrants

Before I begin, two paragraphs to put this in context:  This has to do with a secretive group receiving money to use emerging technologies (see footnote 1. and others ) to experiment, and able to sanction crimes. They have sought and succeeded in making most all people I associate with,  controlled in regards to me, for negative and illegitimate purposes. This includes strangers, who have on average, fill destinations or places visited, present offensive jestures or harassment in my presence, and have been involved in stealing from anything that may be carried by me, ie: printed material, contents of backpack, important personal items or documents.

One has to question what sort of recruitment is involved in this locally, and elsewhere this has happened.

US Citizens Corp data base of citizens:

From the Operation TIPS (Terrorist Information and Prevention)

quote: “Each file or entry contains an interested individual’s name, mailing address, e-mail address, and Volunteer Program area of interest. The database contains and tracks names of each individual and the date of expression of interest, type of interest expressed (e.g., Community Emergency Response Team, Neighborhood Watch, Citizen Corps
Councils), and similar information.”-[Federal Register: May 7, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 88)] http://www.citizencorps.gov/downloads/txt/news/02-11253.txt

The experience I have daily, with evidence in names of businesses, from the Mid West to the current location, is the use of an enormous pool of people, to arrive before, the same time, or after, I do, at almost all destination, daily, for purposes stated below. In one area, over a hundred people on call, so that differing people are used each time.

There should be investigation as to whether this system is being used to create pools of people in all the country, for the purpose of assigning them to harassment for emeriging technologies experiments. There has been many people daily for 4 years, that in all locations, daily, fill to one extent or another, all spaces occupied by myself. This takes many people in that there are different people used, to harass, distract for theft, taunt, play on associations for criminal ends. Police in all locations are aware of this, and used. Offices, like FBI or Attorney General, when approached for concerns regarding incidences or crimes that fall within their respective juristiction, are sometimes informed before I call on their offices, and have been ordered to confront me in particular ways, never claiming the seriousness of what I attempt to report.

It takes a vast database to come up with people for specific tasks, from stalking or harassment to serious crimes, over long distances.  I have been met with in airports en route cross country by groups who evidently have been coached for specifics in harassment.

Here are some quotes from the Citizen Corp website, regarding Operation TIPS:

”This new system of records contains information gathered by the Citizen Corps, which is part of the USA

Freedom Corps established by President George W. Bush under Executive Order 13254, January 29, 2002.”

‎2002: Pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a),

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) proposes to establish a new system of records entitled “Citizen Corps Database Tracking System..http://www.citizencorps.gov/downloads/txt/news/02-11253.txt.

Operation TIPS found in Report by Lawyers Committee for Human Rights 2002.

I have placed below as a footnote quotes and link from Lawyers Committee for Human Rights Report mentioning Operations TIPS, from A Year Lost, Reexamining Civil Liberties Since September 11. (footnote 1.). A data pool to outsource actions of crime and harassment, trained and coached, is indeed a real thing.

Harassment using many citizens Sometimes more than 100 citizens per day are used to fill cafes, restaurants, mob at every outing to a mini mart. People have been placed on airlines for this purpose, with seating arranged beforehand. I have evidence of this in records, though all boarding passes for 2006 have been stolen from me.

How these citizens are instructed to do:

Cruel attention includes cutting hair from behind, tampering with backpack, stealing anything I carry, instructing stores to short change when others distract, and malicious tricks using seeming friendly people, etc.. They even use children to steal from me, mob and stalk, etc.

There is mobilization daily, filling destinations, day to day places, vehicles used as well.

There is never any short supply, and no one seems to have a conscience. This is right out of Nazi play books.

If one checks the internet Google: gang stalking; covert harassment, you will find misinformation, a flood of it. Nothing regarding gang stalking, or the internet people claiming to be victims can be confirmed.

Thus stated, a structure similar to Operation TIPS (http://www.citizencorps.gov/) is used as a pool of people, all ages and classes, so that sadistic exercises using emerging technologies, can pervasively fill the subjects every moment with intrusions, some playing on themes, psychological conditioning.

And if you ever wonder why police stations look like a sealed ticket booth at a theater, well, it has some advantages in denying a subject of what is referred to here, access to police for reporting crimes from felony to malicious acts.

“Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) proposes to establish a new system of records entitled “Citizen Corps Database Tracking System..

http://www.citizencorps.gov/downloads/txt/news/02-11253.txt

Somali victim of Gang-stalking

Somali victim of Gang-stalking

It all started one day in July 2004. I did not know what was happening around me except that I was followed / tailgated by many vehicles with Clayton county GA license plates. They followed me wherever I went. They did not talk to me or approach me just “whispers” from distance. Then a team visited my work place. I was followed by “George Smith” with Clayton county tag. I had not committed crime in Russia or US. All I knew was that I was harassed by many people in vehicles in different places at the store, gas station and even at work. Russia had no such harassment program or extra judicial correction system; I was completely unaware and started to act out. I started making phone calls, sending emails.

I didn’t want to be framed, so I contacted relatives and asked for a lawyer. They said I needed “medical attention”.

The deception was that I was railroaded and “gaslighted”. What was happening to me was “traffic mob” as part of gang-stalking campaign. Gang –stalking is systemic form of control which seeks to destroy every aspect of targeted individual’s life. Once a target is flagged a notification is sent out to the community at large, and the target is followed around 24/7 by various communities that they’re in. The community notifications will go out to various places. Apartment rentals, future employers, stores and communities where that target visits will be notified. Doctors offices, fire departments, and police etc. A covert investigation might also be opened and electronic means by civilian spies / snitches as part of the overt and covert monitoring and surveillance process.

Individuals are flagged without their knowledge. These community notifications might fall under mental health and community safety and health laws. It seems that employers, educational facilities, and community centers are in some cases flagging innocent individuals as a means of retaliation, silencing or controlling members of the society.

Individual can be flagged for various reasons. The notification can designate them as “terror suspects” or as having aggressive or inappropriate behavior, being danger to themselves and others etc. This notification system will follow the target if they move, change jobs, visit other areas. It lets the community believe that the target is a person who needs to be watched or monitored
.
The gang-stalking and harassment that started in 2004 continue in 2010. It’s parallel justice system in which no crime needs to committed just projected “future attributes” for life till the targeted individual is DESTROYED both physically and mentally.

Learn more about gang stalking and community notification ( click here)

SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY AND ELECTROMAGNETIC TORTURE

SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY AND ELECTROMAGNETIC TORTURE

The old 1950s building at 610 E 15th St MPLS was renovated for low income persons with MI disabilities in 2005. The NRP grant was about US $ 3 million. Some of the apartments were designated for testing slowkill miniaturized direct energy weapons systems (DEW) and synthetic telepathy system and through- wall surveillance equipment. The human experimentation is done without the consent of the building’s tenants. There is more than one apartment with the DEW and synthetic telepathy system. The firm that did the renovations had the miniaturized robotic system hidden in the ceiling and in the walls as part of the construction.

Direct Energy Weapon ( DEW) : These are nonlethal slowkill low frequency electromagnetic , lasers or microwave weapons. These are called weapons of the 21st century. Persons with Mental Illness are chosen as subjects / targets for testing these weapons as they cannot complain.

Synthetic Telepathy: is the art of electronically transferring thought directly to and from a brain- a Pentagon term used for systems that can read and broadcast thoughts (subconscious voice) and control dreams using electromagnetic properties of the human brain.

I had already tested implantable earpiece for Federal agencies and their contractors. I was given the apartment without the knowledge that I’d be tortured by espionage trainees using the earpiece, DEW, through-wall surveillance and synthetic telepathy.

The crafters carefully selected the operators to be from specific rival ethnicity and/or clan, so bond would NOT develop during the training or used gang stalking to demonize the targeted individual.

The synthetic telepathy espionage trainees in order to avoid developing any sympathy for their targeted victims, probably avoid feeling the emotions of their victims, although they do read the emotional state of their victims by following the squiggly EEG or Electroencephalograph lines on computer monitor screens, as well as the silent words thought by their victims. Then again, who can feel all te emotions which a person has undergone every second of all of their life? The emotions and silent words of their victims can be broadcast against their will to anyone the synthetic telepathy torturers choose to broadcast to, and they also have the power to block or censor any emotions and words of their victims which they do not want to be broadcast. The synthetic telepathy spies can also place their own criminal or antisocial, negative emotions and words into their victims by means of subliminal, subconscious, remote control microwave brainwashing technology, and they can change the voice behind their words so as to make it appear that it is the targeted victim and not themselves who are communicating by means of synthetic telepathy. They can also store emotions and silently spoken or silently thought words onto a supercomputer memory bank which they can rebroadcast at a later time. I believe that the synthetic telepathy operators, although having high I.Q.’s, are probably predisposed towards sociopathic behaviour because of a genetic defect or combination of genetic defects, and that the only way they can sustain enthusiasm in their life is by engaging in an addictive pattern of sadiomasochistic activities. They are probably also atheist in their religious beliefs.

Human Experimentation and Human Subject Protections

Human Experimentation and Human Subject Protections

The Bush administration’s legal framework to protect CIA interrogators from violating US statutory and treaty obligations prohibiting torture47 effectively contravened well-established legal and ethical codes that, had they been enforced, should have protected prisoners against human experimentation, and should have prevented the EIP itself from being initiated in the first place. This strategy therefore may have effectively employed one criminal act to protect against liability for another, as illegal and non-consensual

human experimentation can constitute a war crime  and a crime against humanity, when its perpetration is systematic and widespread.

The Nuremberg Code

International and US prohibitions restricting human experimentation were developed in response to some of the most serious human rights violations of the 20th century. Following the trials of German health professionals at Nuremberg after World War II, international attention was focused on the practice of human experimentation inflicted upon vulnerable human subjects. The fundamental right of individuals to choose not to be subjected to human experimentation  was first codified in the form of the Nuremberg

Code—a direct response to atrocities that took place during the war. Among other protections, the Nuremberg Code states that the voluntary informed consent of the human subject in any experiment is absolutely essential, and that volunteer subjects should always be at liberty to end their participation

in the experiment. In addition, the Nuremberg Code states that any experiment should be conducted so as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury. Implementation of the Nuremberg Code was neither immediate nor consistent. Despite the experiences of World War II, human experimentation on vulnerable populations without the participants’ consent continued in the United

States into the second half of the 20th century. One of the most egregious examples was the Tuskegee syphilis experiment, in which poor African-American men in the South were denied treatment for syphilis so that researchers could study the natural progression of the untreated disease.

The National Commission

In the wake of public outrage surrounding these nonconsensual experiments, the US Congress created the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (National Commission), a group of leading experts in medicine, law, and ethics, charged with developing guidelines on human subject research based on ethical principles. The National Commission made its recommendations in the Belmont Report, establishing “respect, beneficence and justice” as

principles guiding the ethical conduct of research, including the right of informed consent.51 The Belmont Report established the concept that the ethical conduct of research required that volunteer subjects be informed about the risks and benefits, if any, that might accrue to them before they gave their consent. Additional protections were established for vulnerable populations, such as prisoners, whose ability

to give truly informed consent may be problematic. As further protection for human subjects, the National

Commission called for establishment of institutional review boards within medical and scientific organizations. These bodies comprise combinations of researchers, ethics experts, and laypeople that oversee study design based upon ethical principles.

The Common Rule

These human subject protections became codified in federal regulations,52 as well as in codes of professional conduct. Collectively, these regulations are known as the Common Rule. The Common Rule applies to all federally funded human subject experimentation, including all research conducted

by the CIA and the DoD. By the end of the 20th century, therefore, all people who were subject to US experimentation were protected by three interconnected bodies of law: customary international law,

US federal statute, and federal regulations — specifically, the Common Rule. Although the Nuremberg Code is a code of conduct and not, by its terms, a treaty binding explicitly named parties, in the decades following the 1947 articulation of Nuremberg, prohibitions against human experimentation without the informed consent of the volunteer subjects have been deemed by international legal scholars to be

part of “customary international law.” This makes human experimentation without the informed consent of volunteer subjects one of a small number of acts (including genocide and torture) that are so heinous that they are universally considered to be crimes against humanity.